I came to think about this earlier today....the dress was once a tool of sexual control of women. Think about it....the men wore pants (speaking very generally tied to specific christian societys in the past....so nobody can critizie moi :)) and the women wore dresses/skirts. This, in my head and without empirical proof, can be referred to sex...A man had a weapon in his pant, locked in by buttons (later also with a zip), and the woman had her bare legs (sometimes something covering the legs) under the dress. This was a design that gave the control over a heterosexual act; to the man... He could simply undo his pants and fuck. The woman's dress was easy to pull open, and the rest of the story ends with a male orgasm.
Sex, without consent, in marriage was (and is still) a common thing. Maybe the women were not even asked, the dress was just pulled up whenever the horniness came over...
But I don't know....that was just a thought...
No comments:
Post a Comment